#UK #CivilLaw #ExpertEvidence

| truthaholics

EXPERT EVIDENCE: WHEN PART OF THE EVIDENCE IS “ABSURD” – THIS IS NO SMALL BEER | August 6, 2017 · by gexall · in Expert evidenceExperts,

I am grateful to barrister Simon Mills for sending me a copy of the judgment of Judge Waksman QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court) in  BHL -v- Leumi ABL Limited [2017] EWHC 1871 (QB).  Here I look at the judge’s comments on the defendant’s expert evidence. It highlights the need for an expert to independently assess the evidence and to have actual experience and expertise on the issue in dispute.


The action concerned expenses charged by the defendant when collecting invoices on Cobra beer.  The claimant’s case was that the 15% surcharge charged was excessive. The experts addressed the issue of the costs expenses involved and was directly relevant to the issue of whether the 15% was…

View original post 1,395 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s