True Stories of Family Court Failure

EPA Logo
You have probably heard (ad nauseam) about how dads are badly treated by family courts, and how the system is unfair to dads. Groups such as Fathers-4-Justice and Families-Need-Fathers seem to go on endlessly about the same issues. Surely most of what they say must just be sour grapes – after all, you can’t please all of the people, all of the time?
Unfortunately – and it gives us no pleasure to say this– most of what you have heard is probably true.
Dads get a bad deal. It is universally acknowledged.
Of course, this is a shame. But surely we should be putting the children first; if dads get a bad deal – but the children come out on top – maybe that’s the best we can ever hope for?
We wish the reality came even close to this pragmatic aspiration.
The real truth is that dads, their children and their extended families (and ultimately the mothers and society at large) are all harmed by a failing family law system that is simply unable to put children first.Project Fatherhood FL 5- 2015
We have spoken to many parents at ‘both ends’ of the family justice system in England and Wales over several years. The stories we hear (mostly from fathers, but also from mothers, grandparents and other carers) frequently leave us stunned in disbelief and often lost for words – unable to think of anything helpful or constructive to suggest to the many victims of this inhuman and unjust system.
After speaking to so many people, it is our view that our family law system is completely broken, dysfunctional, dishonest, hypocritical and truly damaging to both the children it purports to protect and the long term interests of the nation it should be serving.
The legal industry (I’m afraid I cannot bring myself to call it a profession) benefits no-one but itself.
Here we present summaries of the stories of some parents we’ve spoken to over the years. To protect their identities, some details have been changed, but the essence of the stories remain absolutely true.
If you think these accounts are exaggerated, you can email the original person who told us the story to convince yourself they are telling the truth. Purple Keyboard Campaign 4Family Justice - 2015
From our own dealings with family law that these accounts are entirely believable, typical in fact. (In reality these accounts have been toned down somewhat, we are afraid that people would not believe what really goes on in our so-called courts).
It will probably be appalling to any normal, decent citizen that these accounts are not outlandish, completely atypical accounts of how our justice system completely fails children and treats them with such contempt. The shameful reality is that these are totally normal cases – sadly representative of what goes on in family courts day-in, day-out throughout the length and breadth of the country.
Please read these accounts and make up your own mind. You can send an email to any of the original authors via a link at the bottom of each account.
If you feel anger and disgust after reading these, don’t worry; we’re pleased to reassure you that you are totally normal!  WEBSITE

Power Over Poverty Under Laws of America Restored

Civil Rights in Family Law Florida

“Anecdotal evidence suggests that the DOJ is more willing for abusive officers to remain among the ranks of America’s law enforcement agencies than law enforcem… See More

Let there be justice in America, and let it begin with the U.S. Department of Justice.

At best, if the targeted conduct is graphic and filmed and public outcry is intense, we get “police accountability” . . . an oxymoron given the DOJ’s notorious…


Calling on all Americans who do not want the ruling class through major media…

View original post 577 more words

| Lib Dems quit over leadership’s ‘betrayal’ on UK secret courts!

| truthaholics

Lib Dems quit over leadership’s ‘betrayal’ on secret courts ~ Patrick Wintour, political editor, The Guardian.


Two prominent campaigners against secret courts resign from party as members vote for change to justice bill.

Jo Shaw, Lib Dems

Jo Shaw resigned from the party at the end of her conference speech, accusing Clegg of a betrayal of liberal values. Photograph: Gareth Fuller/PA

The Liberal Democrats‘ reputation as custodians of British liberty received a mauling on Sunday when two of their most prominent campaigners against secret courts resigned from the party, and the leadership was told by its conference for the second time in six months to seek urgent changes to the government’s justice and secrecy bill.

The overwhelming vote at the party’s spring conference in Brighton puts fresh pressure on the leadership to seek new safeguards in the bill when it returns to the Lords next month.

Nick Clegg was…

View original post 986 more words

| Secret courts: what they don’t want the British people to know!

| truthaholics

Secret courts: what they don’t want the British people to know ~ Yvonne Ridley, Our Kingdom.

The ‘secret courts bill’ is heading through the Lords, just as former ministers and MI6 officials face the prospect of public court appearances over torture allegations.

Liberties and freedoms enshrined in Magna Carta more than 800 years ago are under threat from the British government’s plans to deliver a bill that undermines the principle of open justice. This piece will look at the context in which the Justice and Security Bill, or ‘secret courts bill’ as it is nicknamed, is being pushed through and the powerful resistance to the legislation.

The bill is passing through the House of Lords while the country still reels from the most recent Hillsborough inquiry, which exposed a wide-scale cover up involving the police, politicians, and members of the emergency services. It took more than two decades…

View original post 1,332 more words

| UK Secret Courts: The Justice and Security Bill is a chilling affront to British justice!

| truthaholics

The justice and security bill is a chilling affront to British justice ~

    • ________________________________________________________ 
    • Secret courts should have no place within our judicial system.  
    • _____________________________________________________________ 
    •  Kenneth Clarke
      Justice secretaryKen Clarke, diehard proponent of the justice and security bill. Photograph: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images

      It pays to ask a simple question when confronted with a piece of legislation such as the justice and security bill, which has become so complicated that probably no more than 100 people in the country fully understand it.

      Outside parliament, there is a dim sense that the bill will introduce closed material procedures – secret courts – into English civil law in cases where national security is said to be at stake. People are beginning to appreciate that this means a claimant is banned from knowing anything about their case and that this in turn will make it…

View original post 1,173 more words