This is Christopher Booker’s latest column
There is not a judgment up yet, that would allow me to give you an account of what has happened from someone who has heard both sides of the case, rather than just one side. I will keep an eye out.
The column does have the usual Booker hallmarks – the account provided by a single source, the cosying up to the President of the Family Division as being the only person who is trying to put things right, his habit as a ‘journalist’ of confusing making an argument with simply putting words in quotation marks to show his contempt for them, his misunderstanding of many basic legal principles, and his unappealing habit of throwing the Judge’s first name around like confetti – I imagine this is done to belittle them and diminish respect for them. It is a cheap shot.
View original post 527 more words